<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>In Online We Trust &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.molicki.net/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.molicki.net</link>
	<description>Articles about Internet written by experienced manager</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tiger Woods &#8211; Hot Searches</title>
		<link>http://www.molicki.net/google/tiger-woods-hot-searches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.molicki.net/google/tiger-woods-hot-searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.molicki.net/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, it is not an article about the infidelity of the most famous (and supposedly best) golfer in the world Tiger Woods, but in fact it has some common with it. Since the world learned that Tiger Woods is not loyal to his wife and his wife is not happy with it, people start to [...]<p><a href="http://www.molicki.net/google/tiger-woods-hot-searches/">Tiger Woods &#8211; Hot Searches</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.molicki.net">In Online We Trust</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.molicki.net/google/tiger-woods-hot-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microblogging, SMS and MMS</title>
		<link>http://www.molicki.net/media/microblogging-sms-and-mms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.molicki.net/media/microblogging-sms-and-mms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Zygadlewicz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classmates.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia Messaging Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Short Messaging Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.molicki.net/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest issue of Forbes was an article entitled &#8220;The Third Wave in the network.&#8221; The article is about Twitter and its clones. In the article there was the statement that I can not agree and which I decided to address. The question is: Microblogging will supplant SMS and MMS. Ideally replace, giving more [...]<p><a href="http://www.molicki.net/media/microblogging-sms-and-mms/">Microblogging, SMS and MMS</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.molicki.net">In Online We Trust</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.molicki.net/media/microblogging-sms-and-mms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two search engines are not the monopoly</title>
		<link>http://www.molicki.net/google/two-search-engines-are-not-the-monopoly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.molicki.net/google/two-search-engines-are-not-the-monopoly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Axel Springer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiesław Podkański]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.molicki.net/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RP.pl woke up and journalist wrote an article that Microsoft wants to pay News Corp. and the other publishers for leaving Google and transfer to the Bing. As for twenty-first century is quite weak pace, but it&#8217;s  the topic. In view of the fact that Microsoft was to meet with representatives including Axel Springer, a [...]<p><a href="http://www.molicki.net/google/two-search-engines-are-not-the-monopoly/">Two search engines are not the monopoly</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.molicki.net">In Online We Trust</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.molicki.net/google/two-search-engines-are-not-the-monopoly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murdoch prefers Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://www.molicki.net/money/murdoch-prefers-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://www.molicki.net/money/murdoch-prefers-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.molicki.net/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few more news and it appears that it is not paid model and aversion to &#8220;random&#8221; visits are behind Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s decision to block search engine robots access to his websites. It turns out that it is not about all the search engines, but rather only to Google. Can also be so that Microsoft [...]<p><a href="http://www.molicki.net/money/murdoch-prefers-microsoft/">Murdoch prefers Microsoft?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.molicki.net">In Online We Trust</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.molicki.net/money/murdoch-prefers-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murdoch is not able to cope without Google</title>
		<link>http://www.molicki.net/money/murdoch-is-not-able-to-cope-without-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.molicki.net/money/murdoch-is-not-able-to-cope-without-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biz Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BizStone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web search engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.molicki.net/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such a view is Twitter founder Biz Stone, who according to Internet Standard had also said during the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (Nesta) conference: &#8220;Murdoch&#8217;s position against search engines like Google did not bring him any benefits.  Attempts to block search engines access to his resources is as makeing genie back [...]<p><a href="http://www.molicki.net/money/murdoch-is-not-able-to-cope-without-google/">Murdoch is not able to cope without Google</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.molicki.net">In Online We Trust</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.molicki.net/money/murdoch-is-not-able-to-cope-without-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Google&#8217;s index</title>
		<link>http://www.molicki.net/money/beyond-googles-index/</link>
		<comments>http://www.molicki.net/money/beyond-googles-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoogleNews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Searching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.molicki.net/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder from time to time if and when there appear a company that is able to threaten the positions of Google. Another search engine that not only search better information but also will be able to fight with the habits of users. But maybe it&#8217;s the wrong direction? Maybe it&#8217;s content providers are to [...]<p><a href="http://www.molicki.net/money/beyond-googles-index/">Beyond Google&#8217;s index</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.molicki.net">In Online We Trust</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.molicki.net/money/beyond-googles-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
